Doutorado em Estudos Linguísticos

URI Permanente para esta coleção

http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/17528

Nível: Doutorado
Ano de início: 2016
Conceito atual na CAPES: 4
Ato normativo: Homologado pelo CNE (Portaria MEC Nº 609, de 14/03/2019). Publicação no DOU 18 de março de 2019, seç. 1, p.135 - Parecer CNE/CES nº 487/2018, Processo no 23001.000335/2018-51).
Periodicidade de seleção: Anual
Área(s) de concentração: Teoria e Análise Linguística
Url do curso: https://linguistica.ufes.br/pt-br/pos-graduacao/PPGEL/detalhes-do-curso?id=1511

Navegar

Navegando Doutorado em Estudos Linguísticos por Autor "Bessa, José Cezinaldo Rocha"

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    O Processo de Escrita na Pós-graduação: o Academicismo Como Prática de dessubjetivação
    (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2021-11-18) Manso, Guilherme Brambila; Vidon, Luciano Novaes; https://orcid.org/0000000322316279; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3136561352267602; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7978-5020; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0090371350271567; Bessa, José Cezinaldo Rocha; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4655-6832; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4441063127606204; Oliveira, Roberto Perobelli de; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8130-1061; http://lattes.cnpq.br/9314830679981149; Damasceno, Gesieny Laurett Neves; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6556-9968; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1635569588468079; Figueira, Luís Fernando Bulhões; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0748-4987; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6630313342343566; Grillo, Sheila Vieira de Camargo; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0480-2660; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6359773543692470
    This Ph.d dissertation discusses the process of writing the dissertation/thesis and its desubjectivation interface in the life of the researcher in training, understanding this issue in the scope of language studies. Considering statistical data (APGUNB, 2018) and studies in the field of psychology (MACEDO; DIMENSTEIN, 2009; CRUZ, 2020; CORRÊA; SOUZA, 2016) and education (ANDRADE, 2008; PEREIRA, 2013) on the problem of writing in graduate school, it is possible to highlight that there is a demand for more debates in linguistics on the issue. It is hypothesized that the difficulties with the writing of the dissertation or thesis are of a historical, educational, political and identity nature immersed in the subject's relationship with language. For this, it is necessary to activate a theoreticalmethodological framework that understands the researcher in training in its historicity, as well as the social, historical and ideological interface that permeates its linguistic-discursive training. In order to discuss the issues raised, this investigation primarily uses the perspective of the Bakhtin Circle (2002; 2008; 2010; 2011; 2013), in dialogue with contemporary researchers (AMORIM, 2001; AUTHIER-REVUZ, 2004; GRILLO, 2008; FARACO; 2017; SOBRAL, 2009; 2019), to reflect on Bakhtinian proposals and key concepts to the writing process in graduate school, understanding it as a responsive and responsible act and practice with alterities inscribed in different chronotopes. Investigations in the area of academic literacies is considered (LEA; STREET, 1998; STREET, 2010; BARTON, 1994; BAYHAM, 1995; FISCHER, 2006; FIAD, 2015; BESSA, 2015), specifically in the proposal to identify demands and epistemologies related to the context of writing in the Brazilian postgraduate courses. The data analyzed are of two natures, being i) quantitative and national, based on objective research results with graduate students who report their impressions and experiences with the dissertation/thesis writing process; ii) qualitative and local, at the Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo with interviews with graduate students who report the experience of writing the dissertation or thesis. The evidential paradigm (GINZBURG, 1986) allied to the dialogic perspective are the methodological directions for the analyses. The discussion of data indicates that desubjectivation marks in the dissertation/thesis writing process are related to conflicts in the search for identity belonging to graduate studies, to the conceptions of language and academic subject, to the devaluation of the scientific profession and to historical, social and economic contexts that permeate the practice of writing.