Gestão e Regulação de Recursos Hídricos em Rede Nacional - Mestrado Profissional

URI Permanente desta comunidade

http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/17623
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Gestão Regulação Recursos Hídricos

Centro: CT
Telefone: (27) 3335 2324 R*5110
URL do programa: http://profagua.ufes.br/pos-graduacao/PROF%C3%81GUA

Navegar

Navegando Gestão e Regulação de Recursos Hídricos em Rede Nacional - Mestrado Profissional por Assunto "Classification and water resources plan"

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    Planejamento dos recursos hídricos: análise da qualidade democrática com foco na comunicação
    (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2019-01-22) Fernandes, Simone Alves; Rabelo, Desiree Cipriano; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9399-8313; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2092473450223674; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0270687139138162; Goncalves, Monica Amorim; https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7453-7123; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5619914059734915; Lacerda, Fatima Kzam Damaceno de; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3990-7665; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4276464190181885
    Law No. 9,433 / 1997 established the National Water Resources Policy (PNRH), which, among other changes, defined the river basin as a territorial unit, created the river basin committees and defined the management instruments. Among these instruments, there are the Water Resources Plan (PRH, in Portuguese) and the classification of water bodies. The elaboration of both instruments must rely on the participation of public authorities, users and communities in the construction of a collective agreement on the water use. This involves mobilizing these actors and creating conditions for the information’s production and circulation, debates and decision-making - always from a democratic perspective. In other words, it is necessary to launch a broad communication process, with different strategies, means, and tools to reach different audiences and society in general. This process must allow the various actors to have access not only to information but also to effective dialogues channels that enable conflicts to be faced regarding the different uses of water resources and to seek consensual solutions. The purpose of this article is to investigate the relationship between communication and the democratic quality of water resources planning processes. For this, we have taken as a study object the hydrographic basins of Santa Maria da Vitória (SMV) and Jucu, both rivers of Espírito Santo. Using the qualitative and descriptive methodology, we have analyzed the documents produced in the mentioned planning activities. And we have conducted interviews with relevant stakeholders. Data analysis was carried out considering the authors who have dealt with communication and social mobilization in the perspective of citizenship. We also have considered Brazilian legal guidelines and international institutions for participation in water resources management. The analysis results pointed out to a communication centered on the mass media, without articulation with the levels of group and personal communication to amplify the mobilization. Unidirectional flows prevail, including the use of New Communication Technologies. Despite the proposal to involve the various actors, there are no investments in languages other than those of a technical-scientific nature, as well as the construction of the basin identity using symbolic elements is disregarded. With this research, we hope to contribute to the democratic quality of the processes of elaborating classification and PRHs in the dimension related to communication.
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    Planejamento dos recursos hídricos: análise da qualidade democrática com foco nos níveis de participação
    (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2019-01-21) Bissoli, Ana Paula Alves; Rabelo, Desiree Cipriano; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9399-8313; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2092473450223674; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7672-7220; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1239766276661709; Goncalves, Monica Amorim; https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7453-7123; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5619914059734915; Lacerda, Fatima Kzam Damaceno de; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3990-7665; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4276464190181885
    Law 9,433 / 1997, which established the National Policy for Water Resources (PNRH, in Portuguese), predicted several collegiate decision-making bodies and also the management instruments to be developed, incorporating debates with different society segments. We recognize here a double challenge: to better understand the limits, possibilities and effectiveness of participatory institutions in Brazil – regarding water resources councils and river basin committees (CBHs); and to promote and qualify the participation of civil society and water users in particular. All these issues are highlighted in the elaboration and approval for the classification of water bodies and Water Resources Plans (PRH, in Portuguese). Considering that the democratic quality of the participatory processes is the result of different factors, in this article, we specifically dealt with the participatory methods in the planning instruments provided by PNRH. Regarding the various meanings attributed to "participatory", for this analysis, we assumed the approach of participation levels or degrees: information, consultation, and active involvement. These are increasing levels of empowerment or power-sharing and are not always guaranteed in participatory instances. Our study object consisted in the elaboration process for the inclusion and PRH of the hydrographic basins of Santa Maria da Vitória (SMV) river and Jucu river, both in the state of Espírito Santo. The qualitative research used bibliographical and documentary surveys (especially regarding the materials produced during the planning) and interviews with strategic actors from both basins. Although characterized as "participatory", the process analysis identified problems at the most basic level of participation: information. This compromises the query results carried out and mainly the active involvement. With the analysis of the possibilities, limits, and effectiveness of each level of participation, we expect to contribute to the improvement of the democratic quality of the participatory water resources planning processes conducted within the CBHs