Mestrado em Direito Processual

URI Permanente para esta coleção

http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/17546

Nível: Mestrado Acadêmico
Ano de início: 2006
Conceito atual na CAPES: 4
Ato normativo: Homologado pelo CNE (Port. MEC 946 de 29/11/2021). Publicado no DOU 30/11/2021, seç. 1, p. 63. Parecer CNE/CES nº 499/2017.
Periodicidade de seleção: Semestral
Área(s) de concentração: Justiça, Processo e Constituição
Url do curso: https://direito.ufes.br/pt-br/pos-graduacao/PPGDIR/detalhes-do-curso?id=1512

Navegar

Navegando Mestrado em Direito Processual por Assunto "Ação judicial"

Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    A autodeterminação quilombola na suprema corte brasileira : uma análise do processo judicial da ação direta de inconstitucionalidade n.° 3.239
    (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2018-05-03) Muniz, Lucas Pacif do Prado; Silva, Sandro José da; Pompeu, Júlio César; Vincenzi, Brunela Vieira de; Francischetto, Gilsilene Passon Picoretti; Ribeiro Júnior, Humberto
    The objective is to describe the trajectory of institutionalization of the right of collective selfdetermination of quilombolas peoples in the Brazilian Law through the judicial process. The intention is demonstrate how this right foreseen in Convention n.º 169 of International Labor Organization, in force in Brazil, was seized by the agents of the legal field who acted in the process: on the one side as a right incompatible with the Constitution of 1988 and other internal legislation and, on the other side, as a legal resource capable of influencing the attribution of the normative sense of art. 68 of the Transitory Constitutional Provisions Act that provides for the territorial right of the remaining quilombo communities. The object of analysis that results in this dissertation is the direct action of unconstitutionality nº. 3.239 in ambit of the Federal Supreme Court, where the request is filed for the declaration of unconstitutionality of Decree n.º 4.887/2003, which establishes the procedures for identification, recognition, demarcation and titling of quilombos. It is a case study in which the electronic media of the judicial process were analyzed through the reading of legal pieces and visualization of the plenary sessions, with the recording and organization of the information obtained. The attention focus falls on the alleged material unconstitutionality of the contested decree, directly related to the right of self-determination of the remnants. During the study, it was found that the judicial process, for approximately 15 years, became an arena of symbolic struggles for the legitimate consecration of the conceptual definition of quilombo, an object opened since the resumption of debates, at the time promulgation of the 1988 Constitution, about which would be recipients of art. 68. There was a confrontation of two conceptual paradigms: one with a colonial basement established by the 1740 legislation and the other contemporary, elaborated by the Brazilian Anthropology Association in 1994. It was concluded that the Court legitimized the anthropological concept of quilombo and built the normative meaning of the right of self-determination of quilombola peoples, institutionalizing based in the elements self-definition, ethnicity and territoriality. With this, it established conditions for the effective access to territory to the remaining communities, as provided for in the 1988 Constitutional Charter.
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    As condições da ação sob a ótica do constructivismo lógico-semântico
    (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2018-04-27) Rezende, Priscilla Correa Gonçalves; Moussallem, Tárek Moysés; Rodrigues, Marcelo Abelha; Mendonça, Cristiane
    There is no way to convey knowledge without language. Therefore, language is indispensable for the construction of any science, such as the Law Science, whose object of study is also a linguistic phenomenon: the positive law. With that in mind, and considering the doctrinal and jurisprudential dissonance regarding the subject, this master's thesis is dedicated to define conditions of action and to identify the legal nature of interest to claim and legal standing, according to the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code of 2015. It is intended to establish a parallel between the merit, the interest to claim, the legal standing and the assertion theory, so that it can be determined in which modality fits a res judicata that takes place on the decisions that mention these questions. For this, the approach concerns about the terms of language, according to logical schemes that bring consistency to the message transmitted, with the syntactic organization of the sentence and with the content of the words, aiming at coherence in the scientific discourse. That is why the perspective will be from the angle of the logical-semantic constructivism. The theme is developed with concepts extracted from the General Theory of Law, such as the notion of system, legal norm, primary legal norm, secondary legal norm, material legal relationship, procedural legal relationship. The research is focused on the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code of 2015, not forgetting to punctuate the writing changes that occurred regarding the conditions of the action in comparison to the previous law. The issue acquires relevant contours on the analysis of judgments drawn by the various Brazilian courts about the subject.There is no way to convey knowledge without language. Therefore, language is indispensable for the construction of any science, such as the Law Science, whose object of study is also a linguistic phenomenon: the positive law. With that in mind, and considering the doctrinal and jurisprudential dissonance regarding the subject, this master's thesis is dedicated to define conditions of action and to identify the legal nature of interest to claim and legal standing, according to the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code of 2015. It is intended to establish a parallel between the merit, the interest to claim, the legal standing and the assertion theory, so that it can be determined in which modality fits a res judicata that takes place on the decisions that mention these questions. For this, the approach concerns about the terms of language, according to logical schemes that bring consistency to the message transmitted, with the syntactic organization of the sentence and with the content of the words, aiming at coherence in the scientific discourse. That is why the perspective will be from the angle of the logical-semantic constructivism. The theme is developed with concepts extracted from the General Theory of Law, such as the notion of system, legal norm, primary legal norm, secondary legal norm, material legal relationship, procedural legal relationship. The research is focused on the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code of 2015, not forgetting to punctuate the writing changes that occurred regarding the conditions of the action in comparison to the previous law. The issue acquires relevant contours on the analysis of judgments drawn by the various Brazilian courts about the subject.
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    O processo judicial como método para identificação do conteúdo do princípio da supremacia do interesse público em casos concretos
    (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2017-06-13) Castiglioni Neto, Antônio Júlio; Madureira, Claudio Penedo; Pedra, Anderson Sant'Ana; Guimarães, Jader Ferreira; Rabelo, Manoel Alves
    De la divergence doctrinale entre ceux qui défendent l'existence du principe de la suprématie de l'intérêt public et ceux qui ne reconnaissent pas leur caractère principiológico, l'étude vise à démontrer que cette dissidence méthodologique est résolu par l'adoption d'un concept d'intérêt public qui est traduit par un intérêt pour produire des réponses conformes à la légalité. Dans ce contexte, les intérêts défendus par des individus peuvent également être admissibles comme publics à condition qu'ils trouvent un soutien dans l'ordre juridique positif. Dans cette optique, la suprématie de l'intérêt public ne sera pas satisfaite par l'adoption de règles a priori ou par l'utilisation de formules axiomatiques qui sont réfractaires à l'argument. Au contraire, il sera atteint par l'identification correcte de la meilleure forme d'application de la légalité, dans un cas particulier. Il arrive, cependant, que la loi de notre temps présente un caractère problématique, provoquée par l'indétermination sémantique de ses dispositions légales, le contexte qui comprend le propre polysémie des mots suprématie de l'intérêt public. Face à cette situation, cette recherche vise à induire la compréhension que le principe de la suprématie de l'intérêt public doit être reconstruit dans le plan d'interprétation, avec la perception des particularités de cas individuels. Par conséquent, le processus judiciaire, l'arène principale où les positions juridiques contradictoires se resserrent, se qualifiera, non seulement comme une méthode pratique d'application de la norme, mais en fin de compte, comme un moyen de mesurer l'intérêt public dans le contexte de l'espèce examine. Les résultats ont confirmé la capacité du modèle processus civil positivado par le Code de Procédure Civile 2015 à des fins d'identification dans l'intérêt public et sa suprématie dans des cas spécifiques, en particulier parce qu'il montre consacré à la dialectique, à l’argument et la herméneutiques reconstructive des textes juridique, fait notable à la réception (i) de la contradiction substantielle; (Ii) de l'obligation de coopération entre les sujets de procédure; (Iii) et de l'adoption de la technique précédente.
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    O processo judicial sob a perspectiva da teoria da justiça de Axel Honneth
    (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2017-06-05) Rezende, Ariadi Sandrini; Vincenzi, Brunela Vieira de; Luchi, José Pedro; Melo, Filipe Augusto Barreto Campello de
    The purpose of this dissertation is to investigate whether the judicial process, as it is currently conceived, has the capacity to be a vehicle for execution of social freedom which is investigated by Axel Honneth's theory of justice. In order to do this, it is utilized the book Freedom’s Right, a theoretical milestone of this essay, highlighting the evolution of freedom’s spheres, which originate from juridical sphere, go through the moral and culminate in the social one. Empirical researches were done in the Public Defender's Office of Espírito Santo State. It works as the representative of hyposufficient individuals in proceedings in the court, and it is responsible to diagnosis the level of social freedom in the legal action. There is no certainty if the problem of judicial process, broadens or restricts social freedom. This dissertation will conclude that individuals, who do not participate intersubjectively in the autonomous creation of procedural rules, nor are inserted in social intuitions aimed at solutions of conflicts in society, cannot enjoy social freedom, through heteronomous state justice, in the way introduced by Honneth. This work is due to the current importance given to the philosopher Axel Honneth, mainly because of the emancipatory potential that his philosophy brings from the tradition of the critical theory of Frankfurt school. Analyze the judicial process from the perspective of social freedom, situation that is not explored nationally, allows us to sketch paths to a society of intersubjectively autonomous and emancipated individuals.