Doutorado em Ciências Sociais

URI Permanente para esta coleção

http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/17511

Nível: Doutorado
Ano de início: 2018
Conceito atual na CAPES: 4
Ato normativo: Aprovado na 180ª Reunião do Conselho Técnico-Científico da Educação Superior (CTC-ES), realizada no período de 17 a 19 de outubro de 2018, em Brasília.
Periodicidade de seleção: Anual
Url do curso: https://cienciassociais.ufes.br/pt-br/pos-graduacao/PGCS/detalhes-do-curso?id=128

Navegar

Navegando Doutorado em Ciências Sociais por Autor "Barbosa, Nara Lima Mascarenhas"

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    Dimensões de poder na governança policêntrica de desastres : atores, dinâmicas e resultados
    (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2025-11-21) Barbosa, Nara Lima Mascarenhas; Carlos, Euzeneia; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0553-2746; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5041035987649708; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3246-4849; http://lattes.cnpq.br/6992210683959012; Marques, Marcelo de Souza; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2395-0191; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3343853259417906; Torres, Pedro Henrique Campello; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0468-4329; http://lattes.cnpq.br/4299440848442844; Puga, Bruno Peregrina; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9602-6907; http://lattes.cnpq.br/3658728948997801; Silva, Marta Zorzal e; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5622-5389; http://lattes.cnpq.br/2461902946855298
    This thesis examines the influence of power dynamics on the structure and functioning of polycentric disaster governance, as well as their effects on the principles of equity and accountability, which are central to the Loss and Damage (L&D) perspective. Grounded in polycentric governance theory, it proposes an Integrated Model for Disaster Governance Analysis (MIAGD), applied to the institutional arrangement established to address the disaster caused by the collapse of the Fundão dam in Mariana, Minas Gerais (MG), in 2015, which affected the Doce River Basin. The MIAGD articulates five analytical dimensions: 1) the nature and scope of the disaster; 2) the fundamental attributes of polycentric governance; 3) the three-dimensional typology of power; 4) the enabling conditions of polycentric governance (institutional diversity, comprehensive rule system, interaction among decision-making centers, accountability mechanisms, and mechanisms for cooperation and conflict resolution); and 5) the Loss and Damage principles of equity and accountability. The research adopted a qualitative approach based on process tracing. The temporal scope of the analysis covers three distinct phases of governance between 2015 and 2022.The research found that the dynamics among structured power, pragmatic power (or practical authority), and framing power shaped the disaster governance process in the Rio Doce Basin. The mobilization of practical authority and framing power influenced the governance structure through attempts to adjust the centralized design established by the TTAC. However, such changes proved insufficient to ensure the functionality and adaptability of the enabling conditions for polycentric governance, as the concentration of power combined with the high participation costs set forth in the TAC-Governança, prevented these adjustments from producing effective outcomes. Furthermore, the intense judicialization resulting from the Renova Foundation’s repeated noncompliance with the agreements made the governance system increasingly monocentric, ultimately leading it to collapse. In this sense, the enabling conditions of polycentric governance, although formally present in the institutional design, proved to be maladaptive and dysfunctional, undermining equity and accountability in the context of Loss and Damage. Nearly a decade after the disaster, the governance system has come to an end without ensuring compensation and reparation for the affected populations.Therefore, the study concludes that disaster governance in the Doce River Basin reveals the limits of polycentric governance in contexts where monocentric and polycentric logics coexist.