Mestrado em Direito Processual

URI Permanente para esta coleção

http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/17546

Nível: Mestrado Acadêmico
Ano de início: 2006
Conceito atual na CAPES: 4
Ato normativo: Homologado pelo CNE (Port. MEC 946 de 29/11/2021). Publicado no DOU 30/11/2021, seç. 1, p. 63. Parecer CNE/CES nº 499/2017.
Periodicidade de seleção: Semestral
Área(s) de concentração: Justiça, Processo e Constituição
Url do curso: https://direito.ufes.br/pt-br/pos-graduacao/PPGDIR/detalhes-do-curso?id=1512

Navegar

Navegando Mestrado em Direito Processual por Assunto "Abuso de direito"

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    O assédio processual no Processo Civil brasileiro
    (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2023-12-15) Marchiori, Bruna Figueira; Silvestre, Gilberto Fachetti; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3604-7348; http://lattes.cnpq.br/7148335865348409; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1869-0567; http://lattes.cnpq.br/8474156424355190; Moschen, Valesca Raizer Borges; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3974-8270; http://lattes.cnpq.br/0322058380590726; Bufulin, Augusto Passamani; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3108-4932; http://lattes.cnpq.br/8550788333713502; Santos, Thiago Rodovalho dos; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5402-7335; http://lattes.cnpq.br/5142974418646979; Siqueira, Thiago Ferreira; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1763-2234; http://lattes.cnpq.br/1377110680976833
    This research focuses on vexatious litigation in the context of Brazilian Civil Procedural Law. The general objectives of the research are to identify and systematize the requirements that configure vexatious litigation and to analyze the procedural techniques available to address it. Adopting a qualitative approach and using the inductive method, the research relies on the review of legal documents, consultation of specialized bibliography, and analysis of jurisprudence. This investigation aims to categorize vexatious litigation within the theory of procedural illicit acts, aiming at the identification of its constitutive elements. Through the analysis of the figures of Sham Litigation and Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation, true manifestations of false litigations in Common Law, it seeks to identify how the right to action can be instrumentalized to achieve illicit ends. The research identifies how the National Council of Justice (CNJ), the Judiciary and the Legislative Power have been addressing the issue of vexatious litigation, indicating the successes and failures in the approaches adopted so far, and proposing recommendations for more effective management of this phenomenon. Additionally, useful procedural techniques for efficiently dealing with vexatious litigation are presented. In this sense, the research formulates guidelines about the civil responsibility of the vexatious litigator and indicates how lis pendens, res judicata, and connection represent instrumental procedural techniques for dealing with harassment. Such considerations offer theoretical and practical contributions on the topic. By identifying the specific requirements of the phenomenon and systematizing appropriate procedural techniques, this research provides effective solutions for dealing with vexatious litigation, without sacrificing procedural guarantees of litigants, such as access to justice and the legitimate exercise of the right to action.
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    Tutela de evidência sancionatória sob a perspectiva do juiz
    (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2018-05-25) Kiefer, Kelly; Rabelo, Manoel Alves; Machado, Marcelo Pacheco; Rodrigues, Marcelo Abelha
    It studies, from the point of view of the magistrate, the applicability of art. 311, I of CPC / 15, which deals with the grant of protection of evidence in the hypothesis of abuse of the right of defense or manifest protelatory purpose of the defendant. The objective is to identify the obstacles to the application of the norm and, based on a bibliographical and jurisprudential research, propose suitable measures to guarantee the effectiveness of the norm, presupposing a publicist conception of the process in which ethical elements emerge based on objetive good faith principle and procedural loyalty. It develops the subject from the historical analysis of the protection of evidence up to the present day and makes an approach to the treatment conferred on the institute in both the ordering, the doctrine and the patriotic courts to find the reasons why the norm has little applicability. It then correlates the issue with the abuse of procedural law and the judge’s powers. It concludes by the need to give greater attention to the behavior of the procedural participantes in order to prevent and inhibit abusive conduct, possibly granting immediately the good of life to the injured part, as long as it presents the probability of the alleged right.