Mestrado em Direito Processual

URI Permanente para esta coleção

http://repositorio.ufes.br/handle/10/17546

Nível: Mestrado Acadêmico
Ano de início: 2006
Conceito atual na CAPES: 4
Ato normativo: Homologado pelo CNE (Port. MEC 946 de 29/11/2021). Publicado no DOU 30/11/2021, seç. 1, p. 63. Parecer CNE/CES nº 499/2017.
Periodicidade de seleção: Semestral
Área(s) de concentração: Justiça, Processo e Constituição
Url do curso: https://direito.ufes.br/pt-br/pos-graduacao/PPGDIR/detalhes-do-curso?id=1512

Navegar

Navegando Mestrado em Direito Processual por Autor "3º membro da banca"

Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    A remessa necessária no código de processo civil de 2015 e seus desdobramentos na atuação da advocacia pública : problema ou solução?
    (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2016-04-29) Menezes, Felipe Barbosa de; Co-orientador1; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; Co-orientador2; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; Co-orientador3; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; Co-orientador4; ID do co-orientador4; Lattes do co-orientador4; Orientador1; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; Orientador2; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 1º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 2º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 3º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 4º membro da banca; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 5º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 6º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 7º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/
    The Code of Civil Procedure of 2015 updated the rules concerning compulsory appeal, bringing about important innovations in this legal instrument, especially with regard to the limits of procedural prerogatives. This paper aims to discuss compulsory appeal under the new CCP, in order to demonstrate specifically that the legislator’s choice to determine their unsuitability in cases with sentences that reproduce binding guidelines signed under the administrative aegis of the public entity involved in the litigation (Art. 496, par. 4) allows for the compatibility between the aforementioned legal instrument and the jurisdictional control exercised by public attorneys over legal action practiced by the Brazilian Administration, which also encompasses the framework of rights and interests presented in court by public authorities that disregard the law, as interpreted and applied by the jurisprudence of Brazilian courts. The problem presented by the previous legal regime was that taking a case back to court – as mandated by compulsory appeal, even when public authorities found themselves in favor of the plaintiff’s case (by withholding all appeals and defense, recognizing the plaintiff’s complaint, celebrating agreements, etc.) – prevented the lawsuit’s successful resolution in the first instance, which hampered the efficacy of public attorneys’ jurisdictional control in their litigative duties. This issue seems to have been corrected by the CCP of 2015, specifically by Article 496, paragraph 4, item IV, which bars the use of compulsory appeal in returning a case to court over sentences that overturn the legal arguments made by the public attorneys, thus allowing for a dispute’s resolution in the first instance
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    Ação rescisória fundada em posterior decisão de inconstitucionalidade do Supremo Tribunal Federal
    (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2024-05-24) Santana, Gabriel de Oliveira Coelho; Co-orientador1; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; Co-orientador2; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; Co-orientador3; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; Co-orientador4; ID do co-orientador4; Lattes do co-orientador4; Orientador1; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; Orientador2; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 1º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 2º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 3º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 4º membro da banca; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 5º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 6º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 7º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/
    This work seeks to analyse the rescission action based on subsequent unconstitutionality decision by the Federal Supreme Court which is in art. 525, § 15 and art. 535, §8º, Code of Civil Procedure, searching to analyse its interpretative and temporal limits. To achieve this goal, it was searched to identify the contemporanious dimesions of legal certainty, which is not a principle based on an all-or-nothing idea, but that brings a requirement of calculability, reliability and knowability. Given this dimesions of legal certainty, it was identified how they are related with res judicata, especially with regard to preclusive efficacy. After this, it was studied the atipycal relativization of “unconstitutional res judicata” theory, to investigate how the unconstitutionality and the res judicata are related, and also the repercussions that this doctrinal current had on legislation. It was also investigated how do the effects of the unconstitutionality decision operates in in the Brazilian legal system, as well if there is any constitutional obstacle to the establishment of a hypothesis of rescission action based on a subsequent decision of the Federal Supreme Court. After these analyses, the interpretative limits of the rescission action of art. 525, §15 and 535, §8º, Code of Civil Procedure were properly investigated, ocasion in which it was proposed an interpretative possibility that was in line with the principle of legal certainty, limiting its scope of incidence. Finally, it was analysed how the effects modulation influences in this rescission action, as well the possibility that this techinic may be used not only by the Federal Supreme Court, but also by the ordinary court that makes the judgment of the rescission demand based on subsequent unconstitutionality decision
  • Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
    Item
    Boa-fé processual e preclusão : a insubsistência da tese das “nulidades de algibeira”
    (Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, 2024-06-07) Henriques, Felipe Sardenberg Guimarães Trés; Co-orientador1; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; Co-orientador2; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; Co-orientador3; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; Co-orientador4; ID do co-orientador4; Lattes do co-orientador4; Orientador1; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; Orientador2; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 1º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 2º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 3º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 4º membro da banca; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 5º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 6º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/; 7º membro da banca; https://orcid.org/; http://lattes.cnpq.br/
    Objective: This research delves into the realm of procedural invalidities in Brazilian civil procedure law, examining the role of procedural good faith and the legal framework of procedural preclusion as outlined in the Civil Procedure Code. It aims to assess the feasibility of the “pocket nullities” thesis, initially formulated by the Third Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice. Issue: The application of the “pocket nullities” thesis implies that all procedural flaws are subject to preclusion, primarily due to procedural good faith (Article 5) and cooperation (Article 6). Problem: Can the general principle of procedural good faith prevent parties from raising, and judges from recognizing, procedural flaws not raised at the appropriate procedural juncture? Methodology: This study employs a qualitative documentary analysis of legal literature, the Civil Code, the Civil Procedure Codes of 1939, 1973, and 2015, Regulation No. 737 of 1850, and rulings from the Third and Fourth Chambers of the Superior Court of Justice. Using a deductive approach, it starts from major premises considered true, which are then subjected to minor premises, culminating in a logically descending movement to propose a thesis on the insubstantiality of “pocket nullities”. Results: The “pocket nullities” thesis lacks support in Brazilian civil procedural law. The research found that its application conflicts with the legal regime of preclusions and procedural invalidities, as well as with principles highlighted in legal literature, by the Superior Court of Justice, and within procedural law itself. Contributions: In addition to demonstrating the inadequacy of “pocket nullities” in optimal procedural practice, the research offers a proactive thesis suggesting their redundancy in addressing belated claims of procedural invalidities. From a practical standpoint, the study identifies existing legal mechanisms to address late claims of nullity. If a procedural act fails to achieve its purpose or causes harm to the parties or the administration of justice, nullity should be decreed, even if not raised at the first opportunity for the party to express themselves in the proceedings. From a societal perspective, this ensures the delivery of judicial services to litigants while safeguarding legal certainty and preventing interpretive abuses aimed at circumventing applicable normative formulations through vague syntagms